« Previous · Home · Next »
Vindictive Blogging--Should I Go For It?
January 22, 2007 11:05 PM
The Wall Street Journal had an article out last week that I am just now getting around to, about vindictive blogging. You know, when some ordinary person does something completely annoying, and you blog about it. They write:
Last month, Eva Burgess was eating breakfast at the Rose Cafe in Venice, Calif., when she remembered she needed to make an appointment with her eye doctor. So the New York theater director got on her cellphone and booked a date.
Almost immediately, she started receiving "weird and creepy" calls directing her to a blog. There, under the posting "Eva Burgess Is Getting Glasses!" her name, cellphone number and other details mentioned in her call to the doctor's office were posted, along with the admonition, "next time, you might take your business outside." The offended blogger had been sitting next to Ms. Burgess in the cafe.
Is this sick and twisted, or a good idea? I have to say, I'm leaning towards the later. Some people are so rude and obnoxious, and it just seems like there's no way to reign them in. Perhaps we need the threat of public shaming and humiliation on the internet to do the trick?
In case you were wondering, here's the original blogger's post about Eva Burgess (who by now, must really, really be regretting that rude, loud cell phone call):
Eva Burgess Is Getting Glasses!
And she’s picking them up Saturday after 4pm! I know this because she was bellowing into a cell phone about it next to me in a café. Apparently, she’s not only inconsiderate, she doesn’t seeem to mind giving a lot of personal information, starting with her full name, to a total stranger.She continued, Eva and Ken Hashimoto “have insurance there," she said…”under a flexible spending account.” “We just have to pay by the end of the year,” she said. And then she most helpfully bellowed her phone number -- 347-886-2157 -- perhaps because she’s lonely and wants total strangers to call and ask how her glasses are working out for her.
Hey, Eva, can I have your bank account number and your log-in so I can transfer a few bucks to my account? I’d like to get a pair of noise-canceling headphones in case you sit next to me again.
On a positive note, the little girl with them, probably Eva’s (and maybe Ken’s) daughter, was very quiet and well-behaved.
Hey, Eva, I know it’s kinda cold in NYC, where you’re apparently from (according to the area code you helpfully dispensed), but here in sunny southern California, at the moment you were talking, it was 58 degrees. Next time, you might take your business outside –- as exciting as I found it, on a morning I would normally have relaxed to the classical music while eating my breakfast and thinking my own thoughts, to instead be a part of your eyecare needs.
Over the top, or just what the Dr. ordered?
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/372
Comments
Too passive-aggressive for me - I'd go up to her after the call and let her know I now had enough information about her and her life to get what I needed for a decent identity theft.
It's bad enough she bellowed it out in a public place - I don't have to compound it by putting it on a public blog. And should something untoward happen as a result of her personal information being made public, who is to blame?
Post a comment
Potential comment conditions listed here. Oh, and you may use basic HTML for formatting.

Hmmm. Well, if the Doctor is me, I'd say, "Yes, but take it in moderation." We could end up with a lot of very trivial complaining getting more attention than it's worth. On the other hand, think of the benefits of live-blogging at the movies, or at a concert. The coughing, chatting, crinkling of candy wrappers - half the time that's what one remembers most from a night's entertainment.